[2021] KEELC 1308 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1308 (KLR)

The court found that the oral application for a third party notice was res judicata, as a previous formal application had already been dismissed by another judge and no appeal or application to set aside that dismissal had been made. The court emphasized that it would not entertain an application that had already...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 1308 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Sukhdev Singh Laly; Defendant: Magnate Ventures Limited; Third Party: Joseph Elijah Kariuki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 682 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Oral Application for Third Party Notice
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
JA Mogeni
Legal Topics
Third Party Procedure, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Third Party Procedure Res Judicata Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sukhdev Singh Laly

Plaintiff

Magnate Ventures Limited

Defendant

Joseph Elijah Kariuki

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Oral Application for Third Party Notice

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's oral application for a third party notice is properly before the court.
  2. 2 Whether the application is res judicata given a previous ruling on a similar application.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant followed the correct procedure under Order 1 Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the oral application for a third party notice was res judicata, as a previous formal application had already been dismissed by another judge and no appeal or application to set aside that dismissal had been made. The court emphasized that it would not entertain an application that had already been determined, as doing so would amount to an abuse of the court process. Furthermore, the court noted that the defendant had not followed the prescribed procedure under Order 1 Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which requires a formal application supported by affidavit within a specified timeframe. The court concluded that the application lacked merit and disallowed the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The oral application to issue a third party notice is disallowed.