[2018] KEELC 2408 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 2408 (KLR)

The court found that although judgment had previously been entered in favor of the applicant, the respondent had subdivided and transferred the land to third parties who were not parties to the suit. As a result, the court held that it could not issue orders against individuals who were not before it. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 2408 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Suleiman Amukoya; Defendant: Shaban Tabu Shikhaya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 257 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Land Subdivision, Execution of Judgment, Third Party Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Subdivision Execution of Judgment Third Party Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suleiman Amukoya

Plaintiff

Shaban Tabu Shikhaya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the District Land Registrar should be ordered to cancel, nullify, deregister or revoke the sub-division of L.R. NO. S/WANGA/EKERO/2491 and revert it to its original status.
  2. 2 Whether the court can issue orders affecting third parties who are not parties to the suit.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought in light of the subdivision and transfer to third parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although judgment had previously been entered in favor of the applicant, the respondent had subdivided and transferred the land to third parties who were not parties to the suit. As a result, the court held that it could not issue orders against individuals who were not before it. The applicant's remedy, if any, lay in pursuing the third parties directly. The application was therefore dismissed for lack of merit, as the reliefs sought could not be granted in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with no orders as to costs.