[2021] KEELC 1102 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1102 (KLR)

The court found that the orders sought by the defendants/applicants—distress for rent and eviction—were final in nature and could not be granted at the interim stage of proceedings. While acknowledging that the respondents were in occupation of the premises and in rent arrears, the court held that the appropriate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 1102 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Suleiman Bittokk Abdhi t/a Azhar Progressive High School & 40 Others; Defendant: Ali Salim Karama; Defendant: Makawi Salim Karama
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 39 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interim Application for Distress for Rent and Eviction
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Landlord Tenant Disputes, Distress for Rent, Eviction Proceedings, Interim Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Landlord Tenant Disputes Distress for Rent Eviction Proceedings Interim Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suleiman Bittokk Abdhi t/a Azhar Progressive High School & 40 Others

Plaintiff

Ali Salim Karama

Defendant

Makawi Salim Karama

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interim Application for Distress for Rent and Eviction

  1. 1 Whether the defendants/applicants are entitled to orders of distress for rent and eviction at the interim stage.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff/respondent is in arrears of rent and has failed to comply with previous court orders.
  3. 3 Whether the interim orders previously issued bar the defendants/applicants from seeking rent arrears or eviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders sought by the defendants/applicants—distress for rent and eviction—were final in nature and could not be granted at the interim stage of proceedings. While acknowledging that the respondents were in occupation of the premises and in rent arrears, the court held that the appropriate course was to have the matter heard and determined on its merits. The court further noted that the interim orders previously issued did not exempt the plaintiff/respondent from paying rent, but also did not authorize the defendants/applicants to take final steps such as eviction or distress without a full hearing. Consequently, the application was dismissed as unmerited, with...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for distress for rent and eviction is dismissed.
  • Costs to be in the cause.