[2024] KEHC 15577 (KLR)
The High Court found that it had already determined the applicant's appeal against conviction and sentence, and the applicant had further appealed to the Court of Appeal. By operation of the doctrine of functus officio, the High Court's jurisdiction over the matter was exhausted after the appeal was determined. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 15577 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Esaiya Otieno Sumba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E007 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DK Kemei
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentencing Revision, Functus Officio, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esaiya Otieno Sumba
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revise the applicant's sentence after having already determined his appeal.
- 2 Whether the principle of functus officio bars the High Court from entertaining the application for sentence revision.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that it had already determined the applicant's appeal against conviction and sentence, and the applicant had further appealed to the Court of Appeal. By operation of the doctrine of functus officio, the High Court's jurisdiction over the matter was exhausted after the appeal was determined. The applicant's attempt to seek revision of sentence in the same court was therefore improper, as the court could not sit on its own appeal or revisit a matter already concluded. The application was dismissed for lack of merit, and the applicant was advised to await the outcome of his appeal in the Court of Appeal if still pending, or to abide by its result if already concluded.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's application dated 27/1/2024 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Sumba v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E007 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 15577 (KLR) (6 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15577 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E007 of 2024
DK Kemei, J
December 6, 2024
Between
Esaiya Otieno Sumba
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant Isaiya Otieno Sumba is a convict for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code vide Bondo PM’s Criminal Case No. 729/2016. He was sentenced to serve 50 years’ imprisonment vide the judgment dated 24/1/2018.
2. The Applicant being aggrieved by the conviction and sentence of the trial court, he exercised his rights by lodging an appeal to the High Court vide Siaya High Court Criminal Appeal No.729/2018 which appeal was dismissed.
3. He further moved to the Court of Appeal after the dismissal of his appeal by this court.
4. The Applicant has not disputed that he exercised his right of appeal wherein he should have raised all issues to do with sentence. He submits that he has been reformed hence he should be set free to serve probation under the Community Service Orders Act.
5. The Respondent’s counsel opposed the application on the grounds that the Applicant had already lodged an appeal to the Court of Appeal rendering this court functus officio.
6. I have considered the Applicant’s application and the written submissions. Indeed, the applicant’s application seeks for revision of sentence. As this court had dealt with the earlier appeal case, it cannot again sit on its own appeal and purport to determine the latest application owing to the principle of functus officio. The conduct of the Applicant in coming back to this court yet it has already determined his appeal must be frowned upon.The term “Functus” is defined at page 840 of Jowitts Dictionary of English Law 2010 Edition as: -“functus officio (having discharged its duty), an expression applicable to a Judge, magistrate or arbitrator who has given a decision made an order of award so that his authority is exhausted.”The Applicant has by his own words confirmed that he has lodged an appeal to the Court of Appeal but has not indicated whether the said appeal is still pending or concluded. If it is still pending, then the Applicant should wait for its determination. On the other hand, should it have been concluded, then the Applicant should content with it and ought not to come back to this court as it is already functus officio. It is clear that the Applicant is playing lottery with the court which cannot be countenanced.
8. In light of the foregoing, it is my finding that the applicant’s application dated 27/1/2024 lacks merit. The same is dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. D. KEMEIJUDGEIn the presence of:Esaiya Otieno Sumba………. ApplicantMocha…………..for RespondentOgendo…………Court Assistant