[1998] KECA 194 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 194 (KLR)

The Court held that since there is no provision in the Court of Appeal Rules allowing for the withdrawal of an application, the proper course is to strike out the application rather than permit its withdrawal. The preliminary objection by the respondents was upheld, and the applicants' Notice of Motion was struck...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] KECA 194 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sun and Fun Limited; Applicant: Mayungu Restaurant Ltd; Respondent: Samuel Kanogo Ritho; Respondent: Onmdaln Dpil Aidhtoiwf Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 58 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application struck out with costs to the respondents.
Judges
JE Gicheru, AB Shah, E Owuor
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Withdrawal of Application, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Withdrawal of Application Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sun and Fun Limited

Applicant

Mayungu Restaurant Ltd

Applicant

Samuel Kanogo Ritho

Respondent

Onmdaln Dpil Aidhtoiwf Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants can withdraw a Notice of Motion under the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection by the respondents should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that since there is no provision in the Court of Appeal Rules allowing for the withdrawal of an application, the proper course is to strike out the application rather than permit its withdrawal. The preliminary objection by the respondents was upheld, and the applicants' Notice of Motion was struck out with costs awarded to the respondents. The Court did not address the merits of the underlying application for stay of execution, as the procedural issue was dispositive.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs to the respondents.

Orders

  • The applicants' Notice of Motion dated 13th March 1998 is struck out with costs to the respondents.