[2011] KEHC 660 (KLR)
The court held that the application to transfer the suit from the High Court at Milimani Commercial Court, Nairobi to the High Court at Mombasa was incompetent. Sections 17 and 18 of the Civil Procedure Act apply only to the transfer of suits in subordinate courts, not the High Court. For suits instituted in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 660 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Superior Printers Ltd; Respondent: Kentro Systems Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2011
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 233 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit Between High Court Registries
- Outcome
- application struck out as incompetent
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suits, Territorial Jurisdiction, High Court Registries
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Superior Printers Ltd
Applicant
Kentro Systems Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit Between High Court Registries
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to transfer a suit from one High Court registry to another by way of a miscellaneous application.
- 2 Whether sections 17 and 18 of the Civil Procedure Act apply to suits instituted in the High Court.
- 3 Whether the issue of territorial jurisdiction arises between High Court registries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application to transfer the suit from the High Court at Milimani Commercial Court, Nairobi to the High Court at Mombasa was incompetent. Sections 17 and 18 of the Civil Procedure Act apply only to the transfer of suits in subordinate courts, not the High Court. For suits instituted in the High Court, Order 47 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that there is only one High Court with a central registry and district registries, and the place of trial is determined by the court within the same suit, not by way of a miscellaneous application. The issue of territorial jurisdiction does not arise between High Court registries. Therefore, the application was struck out...
Court Disposition
application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The application dated 18th March, 2011 is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment