[2017] KEHC 9881 (KLR)
The court found that while the defendant had demonstrated financial losses, its proposal to pay the decretal sum in monthly installments of Kshs.50,000 was unreasonable as it would take over 10 years to clear the debt, which had been outstanding since 2009. The defendant's conduct, including failure to make any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9881 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Surgipharm Limited; Defendant: Express Kenya Limited; Third Party: Kenya Airways Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 828 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decree by Installments
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- F Tuiyott
- Legal Topics
- Payment of Decree, Installment Orders, Judicial Discretion, Enforcement of Judgments
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Surgipharm Limited
Plaintiff
Express Kenya Limited
Defendant
Kenya Airways Limited
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decree by Installments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to allow the defendant to pay the decretal sum by monthly installments.
- 2 What constitutes a reasonable proposal for installment payments under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the defendant had demonstrated financial losses, its proposal to pay the decretal sum in monthly installments of Kshs.50,000 was unreasonable as it would take over 10 years to clear the debt, which had been outstanding since 2009. The defendant's conduct, including failure to make any payment since judgment and lack of effort to realize indemnity from the third party, did not demonstrate bona fides. However, considering the defendant's financial position and ongoing business activities, the court exercised its discretion to allow payment by monthly installments of Kshs.200,000, which would clear the debt in approximately 21 months. This struck a balance between...
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The decretal sum of Kshs.6,240,562.10 shall be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in monthly installments of Kshs.200,000 with effect from 31st March 2017 and thereafter on or before the last day of each succeeding month.
- Each party shall bear its own costs for the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION
CIVIL SUIT NUMBER 828 OF 2009
SURGIPHARM LIMITED……...………................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
EXPRESS KENYA LIMITED………................DEFENDANT
AND
KENYA AIRWAYS LIMITED..….…...............THIRD PARTY
RULING
1. There is a request by the Defendant to pay the Decree in installments. That request is the Notice of Motion of 27th October, 2016 brought under the Provisions of Order 21 Rule 12, Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, Section 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya.
2. The Court’s discretion to order for payment of a Decretal amount in installments is one that must be exercised in a Judicial manner and in Rajabali Alidina vs. Remtulla Alidina & Another [1961] EA 565 Law J applied the following tests in considering such an application:-
a. The circumstances under which the debt was contracted.
b. The conduct of the debtor
c. His financial position, and
d. His bona-fides in offering to pay a fair proportion of the debt at once.
3. Sometime in July and November 2008 the Defendant undertook to airlift and deliver the Plaintiff’s goods from Nairobi, Kenya to Khartoum, Sudan. To enable it do so, the Defendant engaged Carriage Services of Kenya Airways ltd (the third party). It is common ground that some goods were lost and on 7th July 2015 the Court entered Judgement in the sum of Kshs.3,238,104 against the Defendant for this loss. At the same time the Court made an Order that the Third Party indemnifies the Defendant in the sum of US$ 1,103. 40 or its equivalent in Kenya Shillings.
4. Because of costs and interest the Decretal sum stood at Kshs.6,240,562. 10 as at 27th June 2016. Todate no payment towards it has been made.
5. The Financial Statements attached to the Supporting Affidavit of one Peter Mutungu, sworn on 27th October 2016 on behalf of the Plaintiff portrays a picture of a loss making Company. The Financial Statements are for the years 2011, 2012,2014 and 2015. Looking more closely at the accounts of 2015, the loss for the year is Kshs.60,088,513/=. There is also Provision for Legal Claims at Kshs.14,400,000/=. The Notes to the Accounts shows that the Legal Claims arose due to current litigation. It is expected that this would be one of them.
6. After painting such a bleak picture of itself, the Plaintiff has made a proposal to pay the Decretal sum in monthly installments of Kshs.50,000/=.
7. But, I agree with the Defendant that this proposal is not reasonable as it will take more than 10 years going forward to pay off the Debt. When it is also considered that the amount became due in 2009 then the insensibility of the proposal is apparent.
8. The Defendant became aware that it would have to meet the Decree when judgment was entered against it on 7th July 2015 and has todate failed to pay a cent towards the Debt. That says something about the attitude of the Defendant towards this Debt. It does not portray bonafides.
9. In addition the Defendant was to be indemnified the sum of US$1,103. 40 from the third party. While this amount may be insignificant when compared to the debt due, the Defendant has not demonstrated what steps it has taken to realize this indemnity.
10. Bearing in mind that the amount became due 8 years ago and the conduct of the Defendant, I accept that the offer made by the Plaintiff to receive monthly installment of Kshs.300,000/= is reasonable as it will take about 21 months from now for the debt to be paid off. However in the face of the plea by the Defendant this Court will order payment by equal monthly installments of Kshs.200,000/-. I have also considered that whilst the Defendant has made losses in the last few years the Company is due to undertake a Construction Project (work in progress) worth Ksh.1,495,659,355/= and that is perhaps true testimony of its Financial Strength.
11. The Application of 27th October 2016 is hereby allowed to the extent that the Decretal sum shall be paid in monthly installments of Kshs.200,000/= with effect from 31st March 2017 and thereafter on or before the last day of each succeeding month.
12. Each party to bear its own costs for the Application.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in Court at Nairobi this 17th day of February,2017.
F. TUIYOTT
JUDGE
PRESENT;
Ochieng for Kirimi for Plaintiff
Kemunto for 1st Defendant
Alex - Court Clerk