[2019] KEHC 4073 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4073 (KLR)

The court held that the receiving order obtained by the applicant in Kisumu High Court Bankruptcy Cause No. 8 of 2014 does not exempt her from criminal prosecution in Sirisia SPMCR No. 229/2017. The court found that the complainant in the criminal case was not listed as a creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4073 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Susan Bukoshe Ombunya; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 21 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Exemption From Litigation
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Bankruptcy Protection, Criminal Prosecution, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Bankruptcy Protection Criminal Prosecution Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Bukoshe Ombunya

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Exemption From Litigation

  1. 1 Whether a receiving order in bankruptcy exempts the applicant from criminal prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's receiving order covers the subject matter of the criminal proceedings in Sirisia SPMCR No. 229/2017.
  3. 3 Whether the use of the receiving order to stay criminal proceedings constitutes an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the receiving order obtained by the applicant in Kisumu High Court Bankruptcy Cause No. 8 of 2014 does not exempt her from criminal prosecution in Sirisia SPMCR No. 229/2017. The court found that the complainant in the criminal case was not listed as a creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings, and the receiving order did not relate to the subject matter of the criminal charge. Furthermore, the court determined that the applicant's failure to prosecute her bankruptcy petition for nearly five years amounted to an abuse of the court process. The court concluded that bankruptcy protection cannot be used as a shield against criminal proceedings and dismissed the application...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of proceedings and exemption from litigation is dismissed.
  • Sirisia SPMCR No. 229/2017 to proceed for hearing and determination.