[2019] KEHC 10861 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 10861 (KLR)

The court found that the trial magistrate's conclusion that the appellant stole from her employer was supported by the evidence, specifically that the money was used for gambling and not sent to the alleged recipients. The appellant's explanation was found to be false. However, considering that the appellant had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 10861 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Susan Kerubo Raini; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 97 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Conviction upheld; sentence reviewed to a discharge under Section 35(1) of the Penal Code.
Legal Topics
Stealing by Servant, Sentencing Review, Criminal Appeal, Evidence Evaluation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing by Servant Sentencing Review Criminal Appeal Evidence Evaluation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Kerubo Raini

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant stole money from her employer as charged under Section 281 of the Penal Code.
  2. 2 Whether the trial magistrate's conviction was supported by the evidence on record.
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed should be reviewed in light of restitution and the appellant's health.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial magistrate's conclusion that the appellant stole from her employer was supported by the evidence, specifically that the money was used for gambling and not sent to the alleged recipients. The appellant's explanation was found to be false. However, considering that the appellant had made restitution and had health challenges, the court exercised discretion to review the sentence and grant a discharge under Section 35(1) of the Penal Code, believing the appellant had learned her lesson during her time in custody.

Court Disposition

Conviction upheld; sentence reviewed to a discharge under Section 35(1) of the Penal Code.

Orders

  • The appellant is discharged under Section 35(1) of the Penal Code.
  • Court bail to be released to appellant upon confirming that complainant's money was handed over by appellant.