[2019] KEELC 3709 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3709 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had died on 30th May 2015 and no substitution had been made since her death. Although no death certificate was produced, the averment of death was not rebutted by the appellant or her advocates, who did not oppose the application. The court concluded that the appeal had abated by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3709 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Susan Khisa; Respondent: Peter Wanyama Kerre; Respondent: Beatrice Nakhumicha Lumunyasi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 02 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Declare Appeal Abated Due to Appellant's Death
Outcome
Application allowed; appeal declared abated; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Abatement of Appeal, Substitution of Parties, Costs Discretion, Death of Litigant
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Abatement of Appeal Substitution of Parties Costs Discretion Death of Litigant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Khisa

Appellant

Peter Wanyama Kerre

Respondent

Beatrice Nakhumicha Lumunyasi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Declare Appeal Abated Due to Appellant's Death

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be declared abated due to the death of the appellant and lack of substitution.
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded against the estate of the deceased appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had died on 30th May 2015 and no substitution had been made since her death. Although no death certificate was produced, the averment of death was not rebutted by the appellant or her advocates, who did not oppose the application. The court concluded that the appeal had abated by operation of law under Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules. On the issue of costs, the court exercised its discretion and found no reason to burden the estate of the deceased appellant with costs, given the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; appeal declared abated; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is declared abated.
  • No order as to costs.