[2017] KEELC 3369 (KLR)
Neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant produced a valid title document to the suit property, nor was there sufficient evidence as to which party was in occupation. The Plaintiff failed to annex documentary proof of ownership to her affidavit, while the Defendant's evidence consisted of a letter from the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3369 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Susan Mbula Mwove; Defendant: Mutisya Mutunga
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 105 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- interim injunction granted in neutral terms; both parties restrained from accessing or using the property
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunctions, Land Ownership Disputes, Adjudication Process, Trespass, Possession, Interlocutory Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Mbula Mwove
Plaintiff
Mutisya Mutunga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of a temporary injunction against the Defendant pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether either party has demonstrated ownership or occupation of the suit property sufficient to warrant exclusive interim protection.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction sought.
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant produced a valid title document to the suit property, nor was there sufficient evidence as to which party was in occupation. The Plaintiff failed to annex documentary proof of ownership to her affidavit, while the Defendant's evidence consisted of a letter from the Adjudication Officer but no register or title. Given the ongoing adjudication process and the lack of clear evidence of ownership or possession by either party, the court found it inappropriate to grant exclusive interim protection to either side. To preserve the property and prevent further conflict or prejudice, the court ordered that both parties refrain from accessing, using, or...
Court Disposition
interim injunction granted in neutral terms; both parties restrained from accessing or using the property
Orders
- Neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant should access the suit property or use it in any manner whatsoever or sell it pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
- Each party to bear his or her own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
ELC. CASE NO. 105 OF 2016
SUSAN MBULA MWOVE.........……..PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
VERSUS
MUTISYA MUTUNGA...............…DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. In the Application dated 14th September, 2016, the Plaintiff is seeking for the following orders:
a. An order of temporary injunction do issue against the Defendant by himself and or his agents, servants or any other persons claiming under or through him restraining them from entering, trespassing upon, grazing livestock, cultivating and felling down trees or vegetation, erecting any structures or otherwise in any other manner whatsoever interfering with the Plaintiff’s/Applicant’s land parcel Plot No. Kibwezi/Mang’elete/2262, pending final hearing and determination of this suit.
b. The costs of this Application be provided for.
2. According to the Affidavit of the Plaintiff, she was registered the proprietor of parcel of land number Kibwezi/Mang’elete/2262 (the suit property); that the Defendant has trespassed on the land and has been grazing livestock, cultivating and felling trees on the land and that the Defendant’s actions have deprived him the use of the land.
3. In response, the Defendant deponed that he purchased the suit property from David Nzioka Mwove; that the Plaintiff sold the suit land to the said David Nzioka and that he was issued with the certificate of ownership on 24th February, 2016.
4. In her Supplementary Affidavit, the Plaintiff deponed that the said David Nzioka Mwove has never had a title to the suit property; that the Defendant is not in occupation of the land and that she is the one who should continue using the land.
5. I have considered the submissions by the Plaintiff’s and the Defendant’s advocate together with the authorities.
6. The Plaintiff’s claim is that she is the proprietor of the suit land. On the other hand, the Defendant has claimed that he purchased the suit land from one David Nzioka Mwove.
7. The Plaintiff has not annexed any document on her Affidavit to show that prima facie, she is the owner of the suit.
8. From the documents annexed on the Defendant’s affidavit, it would appear that the suit property is in an area within which the adjudication process is going on.
9. The Defendant has annexed a letter dated 24th February, 2016 purportedly authored by the Sub-County Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer.
10. In the said letter, the Adjudication and Settlement Officer has stated that parcel No. 2262 Mang’elete Settlement Scheme was demarcated in the name of David Nzioka Mwove who later on transferred it to the Defendant. However, the register in respect to the suit land was not exhibited.
11. Considering that neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant have a title document to the suit property, and in view of the absence of evidence to show which party is in occupation of the land, the most appropriate order to make is for both parties to keep off the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
12. For those reasons, the court makes the following orders:
a. Neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant should access the suit property or use it in any manner whatsoever or sell it pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
b. Each party to bear his or her own costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS THIS 24THDAY OF MARCH, 2017.
OSCAR A. ANGOTE
JUDGE