[2020] KECA 372 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 372 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the applicants had demonstrated that their intended appeal was arguable and not frivolous. Furthermore, the Court held that if stay of execution was not granted, the property in question could be transferred to third parties, thereby rendering the intended appeal nugatory if it...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 372 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Susan Njeri Njoroge; Applicant: Peter Muchiri; Respondent: Geoffrey Thiong’o Kamau
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 56 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution allowed; judgment of the Environment and Land Court stayed pending appeal.
Judges
A Mohammed, S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Stay of Execution, Registration of Land, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Stay of Execution Registration of Land Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Njeri Njoroge

Applicant

Peter Muchiri

Applicant

Geoffrey Thiong’o Kamau

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the applicants had demonstrated that their intended appeal was arguable and not frivolous. Furthermore, the Court held that if stay of execution was not granted, the property in question could be transferred to third parties, thereby rendering the intended appeal nugatory if it succeeded. The Court exercised its discretion under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules to grant a stay of execution of the judgment of the Environment and Land Court pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. The costs of the application were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution allowed; judgment of the Environment and Land Court stayed pending appeal.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment of the Environment and Land Court in ELC Case No. 154 of 2010 (O.S) granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the appeal.