[2016] KEHC 2072 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 2072 (KLR)

The court found that the administrator, Susan Wakhulunya Mang’wana, failed to administer the estate strictly in accordance with the confirmed grant and did not ensure equitable distribution among all widows. The applicants, as co-widows, were entitled to participate in the administration and distribution of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 2072 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Susan Wakhulunya Mang’wana; Applicant: Elizabeth Tsisiche Mang’wana; Applicant: Sarah Akinyi Mang’wana; Respondent: Michael Mang’ana Namatsi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 93 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Redistribution of Estate
Outcome
Application allowed in part; co-administrators appointed; sales and transfers outside grant revoked; costs to petitioner.
Legal Topics
Succession, Revocation of Grant, Estate Distribution, Co Administration, Accounting of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession Revocation of Grant Estate Distribution Co Administration Accounting of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Wakhulunya Mang’wana

Applicant

Elizabeth Tsisiche Mang’wana

Applicant

Sarah Akinyi Mang’wana

Applicant

Michael Mang’ana Namatsi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Redistribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the grant issued to Susan Wakhulunya Mang’wana should be revoked due to improper administration of the estate.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants, as widows of the deceased, are entitled to co-administration and equitable distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether sales and transfers of estate property outside the terms of the grant should be revoked.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the administrator, Susan Wakhulunya Mang’wana, failed to administer the estate strictly in accordance with the confirmed grant and did not ensure equitable distribution among all widows. The applicants, as co-widows, were entitled to participate in the administration and distribution of the estate. The court noted that sales and transfers of estate property outside the terms of the confirmed grant were improper and should be revoked. To ensure compliance and fairness, the court appointed the applicants as co-administrators with the 1st widow and ordered that the estate be distributed strictly in accordance with the confirmed grant. The court further ordered revocation...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; co-administrators appointed; sales and transfers outside grant revoked; costs to petitioner.

Orders

  • The 2nd and 3rd widows are appointed co-administrators with the 1st widow to oversee distribution of the estate in strict compliance with the confirmed grant.
  • Any sales, transfers, or titles acquired outside the grant are revoked.