[2019] KECA 69 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 69 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had invoked multiple jurisdictions regarding the same dispute, including a judicial review application in the High Court, a constitutional petition, and an appeal before the Tax Appeals Tribunal. The judge was not persuaded that the matter deserved to be certified as urgent, as the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KECA 69 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Suzan General Trading JLT t/a Suzan Duty Free; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority; Respondent: The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes; Respondent: Keysian Auctioneers
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 321 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Certification of Urgency in the Court of Appeal Pending Intended Appeal
Outcome
Application for certification of urgency declined.
Judges
FI Koome
Legal Topics
Injunction Pending Appeal, Certification of Urgency, Judicial Review Dismissal, Forum Shopping, Tax Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tax Law Injunction Pending Appeal Certification of Urgency Judicial Review Dismissal Forum Shopping Tax Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suzan General Trading JLT t/a Suzan Duty Free

Applicant

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes

Respondent

Keysian Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Certification of Urgency in the Court of Appeal Pending Intended Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for injunction pending appeal should be certified as urgent.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's invocation of multiple jurisdictions constitutes an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had invoked multiple jurisdictions regarding the same dispute, including a judicial review application in the High Court, a constitutional petition, and an appeal before the Tax Appeals Tribunal. The judge was not persuaded that the matter deserved to be certified as urgent, as the applicant's conduct amounted to forum shopping and there was no sufficient basis to exercise the court's discretion in favour of urgency. The application for certification of urgency was therefore declined, and the matter was directed to be heard in the normal course.

Court Disposition

Application for certification of urgency declined.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 1st October, 2019 is not certified as urgent.
  • The application shall be given a hearing date in the normal manner.