[2025] KEHC 9581 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 9581 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and a certificate of taxation issued. No appeal or reference was pending against the certificate, as the respondents' application for reference had already been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court held that under section 51 of the Advocates...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 9581 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Swaleh, Mwangi & Company Advocates; Respondent: John Kaguma Maina; Respondent: Stanley Kariuki Maina; Respondent: Charles Kanyuga Maina
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 61 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Taxation
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant against 1st and 3rd respondents jointly and severally for the taxed sum, with interest and costs.
Judges
H Namisi
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry on Taxed Costs, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Judgment Entry on Taxed Costs Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Swaleh, Mwangi & Company Advocates

Applicant

John Kaguma Maina

Respondent

Stanley Kariuki Maina

Respondent

Charles Kanyuga Maina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Taxation

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered on a certificate of taxation where no appeal or reference is pending.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs from the date of the ruling until payment in full.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents' opposition based on a pending application is valid after dismissal of that application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's bill of costs had been taxed and a certificate of taxation issued. No appeal or reference was pending against the certificate, as the respondents' application for reference had already been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court held that under section 51 of the Advocates Act and the authority of Musyoka & Wambua Advocates v Rustam Hira Advocate, it had discretion to enter judgment on the certificate of taxation where there was no dispute as to retainer and no pending challenge to the certificate. The respondents' opposition was deemed inconsequential in light of the dismissal of their application. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the...

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant against 1st and 3rd respondents jointly and severally for the taxed sum, with interest and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the 1st and 3rd respondents, jointly and severally, in the sum of Kshs 23,010,220.52 as per the certificate of costs dated 24 January 2024.
  • Interest is awarded at the rate of 14% per annum from 19 December 2019 until payment in full.