[2023] KEHC 3138 (KLR)
The court held that since the applicant had previously filed a similar petition for resentencing, which was considered and dismissed on its merits by a court of concurrent jurisdiction, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the present petition. Entertaining the matter would amount to sitting on appeal over a decision...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3138 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: George Odhiambo Swan; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E010 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition for Resentencing
- Outcome
- petition dismissed as abuse of court process
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Defilement Sentencing, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Constitutional Review, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Odhiambo Swan
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition for Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory minimum twenty-year sentence for defilement is unconstitutional under articles 27(1) and 28 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain a second petition for resentencing after a similar petition was previously dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the applicant had previously filed a similar petition for resentencing, which was considered and dismissed on its merits by a court of concurrent jurisdiction, it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the present petition. Entertaining the matter would amount to sitting on appeal over a decision of another judge of equal jurisdiction, which is impermissible. The court found the petition to be an abuse of court process and dismissed it accordingly.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed as abuse of court process
Orders
- The petition is dismissed.
- This file is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Swan v Republic (Criminal Petition E010 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3138 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3138 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Petition E010 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
April 12, 2023
Between
George Odhiambo Swan
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This Criminal Petition by George Odhiambo Swan was filed on June 15, 2022claiming that the mandatory minimum twenty (20) years imprisonment imposed on him for the offence of defilement was unconstitutional hence it should be reviewed to meet articles 27 (1) and 28 of the Constitution.
2. He claims that he was tried, convicted and sentenced vide Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 575 of 2011. He appealed to the High Court vide HCRA No. 32 of 2015 which was dismissed.
3. That he has now reformed and trained in life’s skills as per the annexed certificates from Mahanaim college, International Youth Fellowship and Prison Project Phillip among others.
4. That he is now God fearing and given a chance, he will tell others of the dangers of crime. He filed detailed written submissions and relied on the decision by Odunga J in Machakos High Court Constitutional Petition No E017 of 2022 to urge this court to render the Mandatory minimum sentence as unconstitutional. That he committed the offence when he was 33 years old by mistake and he cannot repeat the offence.
5. Before I delve in to the merits of the Petition herein, I observe that vide Kisumu HCCR Petition No 72 of 2019, the Convict herein petitioned his court for resentencing and vide judgement rendered on December 16, 2021, the Court dismissed his petition but ordered that the time spent in prison custody pending trial be taken into account in computing the twenty (20) years prison sentence imposed on him pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
6. Having so found that a similar petition was considered on its merits and dismissed by a court of concurrent competent jurisdiction, I find that this court is now bereft of any further jurisdiction to undo what was done by the court and or sit on appeal of the judgment of my sister judge.
7. I find this petition to be an abuse of court process. It is hereby dismissed.
8. This file is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE_