[2024] KEMC 15 (KLR)
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by the particulars of cruelty, desertion, and the unequivocal lack of intention by both parties to salvage the union. The court applied section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, and relevant case law,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEMC 15 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: SWK; Respondent: SOO
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 82 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Irretrievable Breakdown, Cruelty, Desertion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SWK
Applicant
SOO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under the Marriage Act, 2014.
- 2 Whether the grounds of cruelty, desertion, and irretrievable breakdown have been established.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by the particulars of cruelty, desertion, and the unequivocal lack of intention by both parties to salvage the union. The court applied section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, and relevant case law, holding that it cannot compel two adults to remain married where there is no mutual desire to continue the relationship. Accordingly, the petition for divorce was allowed and the marriage was dissolved.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the parties is hereby dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue, to be made absolute in 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
SWK v SOO (Divorce Cause 82 of 2020) [2024] KEMC 15 (KLR) (27 June 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEMC 15 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
Divorce Cause 82 of 2020
JP Aduke, SRM
June 27, 2024
Between
SWK
Petitioner
and
SOO
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Petitioner filed the petition dated 28th January 2020 seeking a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, desertion and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent entered appearance and filed an answer to the petition. These proceedings proceeded defended.
2. The brief facts of the case are as contained in the petition and answer to petition on record. In summary, SWK and SOO solemnized their marriage in Kenya on 20th August 2010 at the Office of the Attorney General. Both the petitioner and the respondent are domiciled in Kenya. They have two issues together. The parties have no intentions of salvaging this marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined in the petition as follows:1. Irreconcilable differences /Irretrievable breakdown of the marriage;2. Desertion;3. Cruelty;
3. At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on the petition and pleadings on record as evidence in support of the petition for divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of the hearing. The petitioner prayed that the petition be allowed as prayed. The respondent equally testified and prayed for an order of divorce on account of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
4. The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under The Marriage Act, 2014 (hereafter, the Act).
5. The applicable law is s.66 of the Act (dissolution of Civil Marriages) which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. adultery by the other spouse;2. cruelty by the other spouse;3. exceptional depravity by the other spouse;4. desertion by the other spouse for at least 3 years;5. the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
6. I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under s.66 of the Act. I have also noted the length of physical separation of the couple herein, the levels of antagonism between the parties and relied on the reasoning of the court in JSM vs ENB[2015]. With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of the Petition and cross-petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ROK v MJB and TPH v NVS 2017 eklr cannot be emphasized enough-“marriage is a voluntary union……this court cannot by any means order or compel the parties to remain married when the petitioner has categorically stated that she wants the same dissolved…” Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the petition dated 28th January 2020 on the following terms:1. the marriage between the two be and is hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear their own costs.
ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH JUNE 2023 IN THE PRESENCE/ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 11. 30AM.In the presence of :1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe2. Counsel for the Petitioner-3. Counsel for the Respondent: