[2019] KEHC 7638 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had already exercised his right to appeal after obtaining leave of court and had previously filed and withdrawn both an application and an appeal. The applicant's claim that delay was caused by inability to obtain a copy of the record was not credible, as he had already managed to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7638 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Syengo Mwendwa; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 65 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Abuse of Process, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Syengo Mwendwa
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the applicant's conduct constitutes an abuse of due process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had already exercised his right to appeal after obtaining leave of court and had previously filed and withdrawn both an application and an appeal. The applicant's claim that delay was caused by inability to obtain a copy of the record was not credible, as he had already managed to file an appeal. The court held that the applicant's conduct amounted to an abuse of due process and that there was no sufficient reason to grant leave to appeal out of time. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2018
SYENGO MWENDWA..........................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. Syengo Mwendwa,the Applicant seeks leave to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence. The Application is premised on grounds that: his relatives promised to hire a lawyer to appeal on his behalf but they lacked fees to do so; the trial Court delayed in providing him with a copy of the Judgment hence the delay; and he was transferred prior to lodging the Appeal.
2. He deponed an affidavit in support of the Appeal where he reiterates what is stated in the body of the Application.
3. The Application is opposed by the State on grounds that the Appellant had filed another Appeal.
4. Section 349of the Criminal Procedure Codeprovides thus:
“An appeal shall be entered within fourteen days of the date of the order or sentence appealed against:
Provided that the court to which the appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, and shall so admit an appeal if it is satisfied that the failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court therefor.”
5. The Applicant herein was convicted and sentenced by the trial Court on the 13th July, 2016. He filed Misc. Criminal Application No. 47 of 2016seeking to move this Court to exercise its judicial discretion pursuant to Article 159(2)(c)of the Constitutionby allowing him to reconcile with his daughter, the Complainant in the case. On the 31st July, 2018the Applicant withdrew the Application. As that Application was pending in Court he filed an Appeal against the conviction and sentence on the 21st February, 2018pursuant to leave of Court granted on the 21st February, 2018an Appeal that he withdrew on the 11th April, 2018.
6. The Applicant herein exercised his right to appeal after he obtained leave of Court. He cannot be heard to allege that the delay was caused by some inability to obtain a copy of the record. In fact the conduct of the Applicant amounts to an abuse of due process. Therefore, I have absolutely no reason to grant the Applicant the order sought. In the result the Application is dismissed.
7. It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 5th day of March, 2019.
L. N. MUTENDE
JUDGE