[2021] KEELRC 649 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 649 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had made reasonable efforts to prosecute the case, including attempting to set hearing dates, but was prevented by circumstances beyond his control, notably the Covid-19 pandemic and administrative delays in the court registry. The court held that dismissing the suit for want of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 649 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Sylvester Harambee Indeche; Respondent: Daly & Inamdar Advocates
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2024 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit not dismissed; matter to be mentioned for fixing of hearing date.
Judges
AN Mwaure
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Covid 19 Court Disruption, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Covid 19 Court Disruption Right to Be Heard

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sylvester Harambee Indeche

Claimant

Daly & Inamdar Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the delays attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic and administrative challenges.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant has demonstrated sufficient effort to prosecute the case and avoid dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had made reasonable efforts to prosecute the case, including attempting to set hearing dates, but was prevented by circumstances beyond his control, notably the Covid-19 pandemic and administrative delays in the court registry. The court held that dismissing the suit for want of prosecution would be unjust in these circumstances. Instead, the court exercised its discretion to give the claimant another opportunity to prosecute the case, emphasizing the need to balance the right to be heard with the efficient administration of justice. The court directed that the matter be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar to fix the earliest possible hearing date,...

Court Disposition

Suit not dismissed; matter to be mentioned for fixing of hearing date.

Orders

  • The case will be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar on 11th November 2021 to fix the earliest convenient hearing date before any Employment and Labour Relations Court judge.
  • A signed copy of the ruling will be availed to each party upon payment of court fees.