[2022] KEHC 16193 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16193 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal because the dispute arose from a landlord and tenant relationship, which falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as stipulated by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16193 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Systemedia Technologies Limited; Respondent: Grace Matheka; Respondent: Upstate Auctioneers; Respondent: Moran Auctioneers; Respondent: Great Rift Valley Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 163 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Directions on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Outcome
Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination due to lack of jurisdiction.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, Landlord Tenant Disputes, Transfer of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Courts Landlord Tenant Disputes Transfer of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Systemedia Technologies Limited

Appellant

Grace Matheka

Respondent

Upstate Auctioneers

Respondent

Moran Auctioneers

Respondent

Great Rift Valley Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Directions on Jurisdiction and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal arising from a landlord and tenant dispute.
  2. 2 Whether the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal because the dispute arose from a landlord and tenant relationship, which falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as stipulated by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011. The court cited the principle that jurisdiction is fundamental and that a court must immediately cease to act once it determines it lacks jurisdiction. Consequently, the court declined to take any further action on the appeal and ordered its transfer to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.

Court Disposition

Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination due to lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • This appeal is transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.
  • No further action shall be taken by this court in respect of the appeal.