[2017] KEELC 2144 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2144 (KLR)

The court found that the consent entered into by the parties on 11th July 2017 was properly signed, binding, and reflected the agreement of all parties present. The consent addressed the transfer of half an acre from the 1st defendant to the plaintiff, preserved the 2nd defendant's share, and provided for execution...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2144 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Tabitha Kathambi Mbaabu; Defendant: Geofrey Murithi M'Ithima; Defendant: David Kiogora M'Ithima
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 230 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Consent Judgment
Outcome
suit settled by consent judgment
Legal Topics
Land Transfer, Consent Judgment, Specific Performance, Land Control Board, Title Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Transfer Consent Judgment Specific Performance Land Control Board Title Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tabitha Kathambi Mbaabu

Plaintiff

Geofrey Murithi M'Ithima

Defendant

David Kiogora M'Ithima

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the consent between the parties regarding the transfer of land is valid and enforceable.
  2. 2 Whether the court should adopt the consent as its judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the consent entered into by the parties on 11th July 2017 was properly signed, binding, and reflected the agreement of all parties present. The consent addressed the transfer of half an acre from the 1st defendant to the plaintiff, preserved the 2nd defendant's share, and provided for execution by the Deputy Registrar if any party refused to sign. The court, satisfied with the validity and voluntariness of the consent, adopted it as its judgment, thereby settling the suit.

Court Disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • The 1st defendant shall transfer half an acre from parcel No. Abogeta/L-Chure/307 to the plaintiff as per the agreement dated 29th August, 2016.
  • The 2nd defendant's share shall remain intact as reflected in the title.