[2016] KEELC 120 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 120 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff, as the widow and administrator of the estate of Edward Mugi Karugu, had established through uncontroverted evidence that the deceased purchased plots No.1311 and 1428 from Stephen Kimani in 1978 and that neither the deceased nor the Plaintiff had ever been issued with share...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 120 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Tabitha Waithira Muugi; Defendant: Githurai Ting’ang’a Co. Ltd (formerly Githurai Co-operative Society Ltd)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 654 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Formal Proof and Judgment After Interlocutory Judgment Due to Non Appearance
Outcome
Judgment for the Plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.
Legal Topics
Ownership of Land, Title Deeds, Share Certificates, Succession and Administration, Transfer of Land, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Land and Property Ownership of Land Title Deeds Share Certificates Succession and Administration Transfer of Land Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tabitha Waithira Muugi

Plaintiff

Githurai Ting’ang’a Co. Ltd (formerly Githurai Co-operative Society Ltd)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Formal Proof and Judgment After Interlocutory Judgment Due to Non Appearance

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the widow and legal representative of the deceased Edward Mugi Karugu.
  2. 2 Whether the deceased was the legal owner of plots No.1311 and 1428 within the Defendant’s company.
  3. 3 Whether the deceased or Plaintiff was ever issued with title deeds and/or share certificates for the two plots.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff, as the widow and administrator of the estate of Edward Mugi Karugu, had established through uncontroverted evidence that the deceased purchased plots No.1311 and 1428 from Stephen Kimani in 1978 and that neither the deceased nor the Plaintiff had ever been issued with share certificates or title deeds for the said plots by the Defendant. The Defendant, having failed to enter appearance or contest the Plaintiff’s claims, left the Plaintiff’s evidence unchallenged. The court held that the Plaintiff had made sufficient efforts to obtain the documents and was entitled to the reliefs sought. The Defendant’s failure to issue the documents necessitated the...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.

Orders

  • The Defendant shall issue share certificates for plots No.1311 and 1428 to the Plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Edward Mugi Karugu and facilitate the issuance of title deeds in her name.
  • The Defendant shall bear the costs of this suit.