[2009] KEHC 1766 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 1766 (KLR)

The court found that the process leading to the issuance and application for confirmation of the grant was irregular. The Kenya Gazette notice was signed by the Deputy Registrar instead of a judge, contrary to the requirements for High Court matters. There was no request to the Principal Registry, and the relevant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 1766 (KLR)
Parties
Deceased: Tabsabei Chelangat Chumo; Applicant: Samwel Kipkemoi Chumo; Applicant: Johana Kiplangat Chumo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Cause 88 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
application for confirmation of grant rejected
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Irregular Issue of Grant, Succession Procedure, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Confirmation of Grant Irregular Issue of Grant Succession Procedure Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tabsabei Chelangat Chumo

Deceased

Samwel Kipkemoi Chumo

Applicant

Johana Kiplangat Chumo

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate was properly issued in accordance with the law.
  2. 2 Whether the application for confirmation of grant can be allowed given the procedural irregularities identified.
  3. 3 Whether property was sold to purchasers without leave of court and the implications for the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the process leading to the issuance and application for confirmation of the grant was irregular. The Kenya Gazette notice was signed by the Deputy Registrar instead of a judge, contrary to the requirements for High Court matters. There was no request to the Principal Registry, and the relevant forms (P&A 30, P&A 57, and P&A 5) were either not properly completed, registered, or disclosed. Additionally, there was evidence that a portion of the estate property had been sold to purchasers without leave of court, which is contrary to the Law of Succession Act. Due to these procedural defects and irregularities, the application for confirmation of grant was rejected, and...

Court Disposition

application for confirmation of grant rejected

Orders

  • Confirmation of grant is rejected.
  • Administrator to regularize the cause in accordance with the law.