[2013] KEHC 1994 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 1994 (KLR)

The court held that the appellant was rightfully acquitted after a full hearing, as the evidence showed the dispute between the appellant and the complainant was over ownership of a bar, which is a civil matter. The trial magistrate correctly found the appellant innocent of the criminal charge of creating a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 1994 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Tandl Josef; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 179 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
GO Shikwe
Legal Topics
Acquittal, Breach of Peace, Criminal Procedure, Appeal Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Acquittal Breach of Peace Criminal Procedure Appeal Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tandl Josef

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the acquittal of the appellant under section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Code was proper.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to have the acquittal substituted with dismissal of charges and charging of the complainant.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute between the appellant and complainant is criminal or civil in nature.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellant was rightfully acquitted after a full hearing, as the evidence showed the dispute between the appellant and the complainant was over ownership of a bar, which is a civil matter. The trial magistrate correctly found the appellant innocent of the criminal charge of creating a disturbance likely to cause a breach of the peace. Since the state did not appeal the acquittal, and the appellant's prayers to substitute the acquittal with dismissal of charges and charging the complainant are not available in law, the appeal lacked merit and was disallowed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is disallowed.