[2014] KEHC 5432 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5432 (KLR)

The court found that although the applicants, as daughters of the deceased, were not allocated any share in the initial distribution of the estate, there was no evidence of fraud or concealment in the grant's issuance, as their names were included in the relevant forms and recognized as beneficiaries. However, due...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 5432 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tarasila Mwaura; Applicant: Elizabeth Kanini Njogu; Applicant: Zipporah Muthoni Njuki; Respondent: Joseph Mbogo Muna; Interested Party: Muchira Justus Muna
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 348 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Grant revoked and fresh grant ordered; revised distribution schedule including daughters; each party to bear own costs.
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Succession Rights of Daughters, Sale of Estate Property, Administrator Substitution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Revocation of Grant Distribution of Estate Succession Rights of Daughters Sale of Estate Property Administrator Substitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarasila Mwaura

Applicant

Elizabeth Kanini Njogu

Applicant

Zipporah Muthoni Njuki

Applicant

Joseph Mbogo Muna

Respondent

Muchira Justus Muna

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of representation was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the grant has become useless and inoperative due to subsequent circumstances.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants, as daughters of the deceased, are entitled to a share of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the applicants, as daughters of the deceased, were not allocated any share in the initial distribution of the estate, there was no evidence of fraud or concealment in the grant's issuance, as their names were included in the relevant forms and recognized as beneficiaries. However, due to procedural errors—specifically, the grant being issued in the name of a deceased administrator and not reflecting the substituted administrators—the grant was revoked. The court ordered a fresh grant to be issued in the names of the proper administrators and confirmed a revised schedule of distribution that included a share for the daughters. The court also recognized that...

Court Disposition

Grant revoked and fresh grant ordered; revised distribution schedule including daughters; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • A fresh grant to issue in the names of Joseph Mbogo Muna and Muchira Justus Muna as administrators.
  • The grant to be confirmed as per the revised schedule of distribution for land parcel NGARIAMA/NYANGENI/444.