[2018] KECA 696 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 696 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants lodged the Notice of Appeal and applied for proceedings within the prescribed time. The certificate of delay covered the period from judgment to the availability of proceedings, but the applicants' counsel miscalculated the deadline for filing the record of appeal. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 696 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tarcisio Kagunda Waitathu; Applicant: John Wang’ombe Waitathu; Applicant: Simon Muchiri Waitathu; Applicant: Teresa Mumbi Gakuru; Respondent: Regina Nyambura Waitathu
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 72 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Extension of time granted.
Judges
F Sichale
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Certificate of Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Certificate of Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarcisio Kagunda Waitathu

Applicant

John Wang’ombe Waitathu

Applicant

Simon Muchiri Waitathu

Applicant

Teresa Mumbi Gakuru

Applicant

Regina Nyambura Waitathu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient cause for extension of time to file the record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the record of appeal was inordinate or excusable under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants lodged the Notice of Appeal and applied for proceedings within the prescribed time. The certificate of delay covered the period from judgment to the availability of proceedings, but the applicants' counsel miscalculated the deadline for filing the record of appeal. The court determined that the delay of approximately 35 days was not inordinate and was excusable due to the counsel's mistaken belief regarding the deadline. Exercising its discretion, the court granted the extension of time, finding that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause and that the interests of justice warranted allowing the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Extension of time granted.

Orders

  • The applicants shall file the record of appeal within 14 days of the date of this ruling.
  • If the record of appeal is not filed within 14 days, the motion shall stand dismissed.