[2004] KEHC 127 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 127 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff's application was unopposed, as the defendant neither filed a replying affidavit nor appeared at the hearing despite being duly served. The court considered the affidavit evidence presented by the plaintiff, particularly paragraphs 8 to 15, and found no reason to doubt the veracity...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] KEHC 127 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Tarcisio Njeru Namu; Defendant: United Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 728 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the plaintiff as prayed in the Notice of Motion.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Insurance Claims, Default Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Insurance Claims Default Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarcisio Njeru Namu

Plaintiff

United Insurance Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant for the claimed sum in the absence of opposition.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant the orders sought in the Notice of Motion given the lack of response from the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's application was unopposed, as the defendant neither filed a replying affidavit nor appeared at the hearing despite being duly served. The court considered the affidavit evidence presented by the plaintiff, particularly paragraphs 8 to 15, and found no reason to doubt the veracity of the claim. In the absence of any rebuttal or contestation from the defendant, the court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought in the Notice of Motion, thereby allowing the plaintiff's claim for the sum specified, together with interest and costs as prayed in the plaint.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Judgment entered for the plaintiff as prayed in the Notice of Motion.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff for KShs 110,995 together with interest and costs as prayed in the plaint.
  • Orders in terms of prayers 1 and 3 of the Notice of Motion dated 11th September 2002 are granted.