Tarus v Postal Corporation of Kenya (Cause 34 of 2019) [2026] KEELRC 2287 (KLR) (31 July 2026) (Ruling)

Tarus v Postal Corporation of Kenya (Cause 34 of 2019) [2026] KEELRC 2287 (KLR) (31 July 2026) (Ruling)

The court held that Rule 59 allows determination of the cause on documentary material and submissions, and in the interests of avoiding delay in an old case it granted the Respondent leave to proceed by documentation despite the missing witness statement.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELRC 2287 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Henry Kipchumba Tarus; Respondent: Postal Corporation Of Kenya
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 34 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Mode of Proceeding and Evidence Filing
Outcome
Application granted; Respondent allowed to proceed by documentation under Rule 59
Judges
["AN Mwaure"]
Legal Topics
Rule 59 Documentary Hearing, Witness Statement Lost/untraceable, Use of Affidavit Evidence, Case Management Directions, Expeditious Disposal of Old Cases
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Law Civil Procedure Rule 59 Documentary Hearing Witness Statement Lost/untraceable Use of Affidavit Evidence Case Management Directions Expeditious Disposal of Old Cases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Kipchumba Tarus

Claimant

Postal Corporation Of Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Mode of Proceeding and Evidence Filing

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent should be allowed to proceed by documentary evidence under Rule 59 where its witness statement cannot be traced
  2. 2 Whether the court should direct the matter to be determined on pleadings, affidavits, documents and submissions

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Rule 59 allows determination of the cause on documentary material and submissions, and in the interests of avoiding delay in an old case it granted the Respondent leave to proceed by documentation despite the missing witness statement.

Court Disposition

Application granted; Respondent allowed to proceed by documentation under Rule 59

Orders

  • Respondent’s witness to swear a supporting affidavit and annex pleadings, bundle of documents and witness statements within 10 days.
  • Claimant to file submissions within 14 days thereafter.