[2018] KEHC 2136 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2136 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely lack of communication with counsel and unawareness of the judgment until execution proceedings commenced. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time. On the issue of stay...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2136 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tasha Enterprises Ltd; Respondent: Ben Khaemba Barasa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 78 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application allowed in part.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Extension of Time, Decretal Amount, Road Traffic Accident
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Extension of Time Decretal Amount Road Traffic Accident

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tasha Enterprises Ltd

Applicant

Ben Khaemba Barasa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the judgment and decree should be granted pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely lack of communication with counsel and unawareness of the judgment until execution proceedings commenced. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal out of time. On the issue of stay of execution, the court held that a conditional stay was appropriate to protect the respondent's interests, requiring the applicant to deposit the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account within 30 days, failing which execution would proceed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to file an appeal within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree in Webuye CC. No. 187/2017 granted for 30 days on condition that the applicant deposits Kshs. 773,900 in a joint interest-earning account in the names of advocates on record within 30 days.