[2024] KEHC 1789 (KLR)
The court found that both Messrs. Kassim Sifuna & Associates Advocates and Messrs. Karanigrey & Company Advocates had, on the face of the record, been appointed by the Plaintiff through board resolutions. However, the Plaintiff had not yet regularized the change of advocates in accordance with the Civil Procedure...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 1789 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tawai Limited; Defendant: Nathan Wanjala Muhindi & 5 others
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 22 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Representation of Plaintiff by Advocates
- Outcome
- Plaintiff granted 14 days to regularize representation; both firms remain on record until proper procedure is followed.
- Judges
- AC Mrima
- Legal Topics
- Change of Advocates, Corporate Resolution, Representation Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tawai Limited
Plaintiff
Nathan Wanjala Muhindi & 5 others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Representation of Plaintiff by Advocates
Legal Issues
- 1 Which firm of advocates is duly appointed to represent the Plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff has properly regularized its legal representation in accordance with the law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both Messrs. Kassim Sifuna & Associates Advocates and Messrs. Karanigrey & Company Advocates had, on the face of the record, been appointed by the Plaintiff through board resolutions. However, the Plaintiff had not yet regularized the change of advocates in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, as the proper notice (Notice of Change of Advocates) had not been filed. Therefore, both firms remain on record until the Plaintiff regularizes its representation. The Plaintiff was granted 14 days to resolve the issue of its legal representation, after which further directions would be given.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff granted 14 days to regularize representation; both firms remain on record until proper procedure is followed.
Orders
- The Plaintiff is granted 14 days within which to regularize the issue of its representation.
- Further directions on the way forward to be issued on a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Tawai Limited v Muhindi & 5 others (Civil Case 22 of 2018) [2024] KEHC 1789 (KLR) (28 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 1789 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kitale
Civil Case 22 of 2018
AC Mrima, J
February 28, 2024
Between
Tawai Limited
Plaintiff
and
Nathan Wanjala Muhindi & 5 others
Defendant
Ruling
1. This ruling is on which firm of Advocates is the rightful one to represent the Plaintiff herein.
2. There are two firms of Advocates on record each claiming to have been duly appointed to represent the Plaintiff. They are Messrs. Kassim Sifuna & Associates Advocates and Messrs. Karanigrey & Company Advocates.
3. The firms filed Affidavits and written submissions on the issue.
4. This Court has carefully considered the affidavits and the submissions.
5. There is no doubt that the Plaintiff is a Limited Liability company. It has a Board of Directors comprised of 9 Directors one of whom passed on leaving behind 8 of them.
6. It appears that the Plaintiff initially instructed the firm of Messrs. Kassim Sifuna & Associates Advocates to act for it. The instructions were latter withdrawn vide a resolution of the Plaintiff passed on 4th August 2023. Subsequently, the Plaintiff formally wrote to the firm of Messrs. Kassim Sifuna & Associates Advocates vide its letter dated 4th August 2023. Both the resolution and the resultant letter were annexed as exhibits in the Affidavit by Mr. Paul Kassim Sifuna, Counsel.
7. On 18th October 2023, the Plaintiff appointed the firm of Messrs. Karanigrey & Company Advocates to appear on its behalf. A resolution to that end was filed in Court. The firm of Messrs. Karanigrey & Company Advocates then filed a Notice of Appointment of Advocates dated 19th October 2023 instead of a Notice of Change of Advocates.
8. The prevailing position is, therefore, that both firms of Advocates are properly on record until one or both are properly relieved of its representation of the Plaintiff.
9. As a result, the following orders do hereby issue: -a. The Plaintiff is hereby granted 14 days within which to regularize the issue of its representation.b. Further directions on way forward on a date to issue today.Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KITALE THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024. A. C. MRIMAJUDGEMr Karani Counsel for the PlaintiffCourt assistant: Juma