[2020] KEELRC 961 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 961 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not notified of the ruling and only became aware of it on 7 November 2019, a fact not contradicted by the respondent. This constituted sufficient cause to grant leave to appeal out of time. The court further held that the issue of limitation is a jurisdictional matter that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 961 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Teachers Service Commission; Respondent: Jane Awino Owoko
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 152 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Proceedings, Limitation of Actions, Jurisdiction of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Proceedings Limitation of Actions Jurisdiction of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teachers Service Commission

Applicant

Jane Awino Owoko

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to file an appeal out of time against the Magistrate's ruling.
  2. 2 Whether stay of proceedings should be granted pending the intended appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in declining to determine the question of limitation, which goes to jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not notified of the ruling and only became aware of it on 7 November 2019, a fact not contradicted by the respondent. This constituted sufficient cause to grant leave to appeal out of time. The court further held that the issue of limitation is a jurisdictional matter that should have been determined by the trial court. To avoid unnecessary costs and save judicial time, the court granted a stay of proceedings in the lower court pending the determination of the intended appeal. The orders were made to ensure that the jurisdictional question is addressed before the main suit proceeds.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted.
  • Appeal and submissions to be filed and served on or before 3 July 2020.