[2024] KEBPRT 665 (KLR)

[2024] KEBPRT 665 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the tenancy agreement between the parties was for a fixed term of one year, expiring on 1st April 2024. The landlord's letter dated 15th February 2024 was a reminder of the impending expiry, not a statutory notice of termination under the Act. Since the tenancy was for a definite period and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 665 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Terazzos Limited; Respondent: Zafarani Development Organization; Respondent: Imah Suleiman
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E408 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Reference / Ruling on Application for Access and Challenge to Notice to Vacate
Outcome
Tenant's reference and application dismissed; tenant to vacate premises by 31st May 2024.
Judges
A Muma
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Termination Notice, Lease Expiry, Landlord Tenant Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Termination Notice Lease Expiry Landlord Tenant Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Terazzos Limited

Applicant

Zafarani Development Organization

Respondent

Imah Suleiman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Reference / Ruling on Application for Access and Challenge to Notice to Vacate

  1. 1 Whether the notice issued by the landlord to the tenant was valid under the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act.
  2. 2 Whether the landlord was required to comply with statutory notice requirements for termination of a controlled tenancy in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the tenancy agreement between the parties was for a fixed term of one year, expiring on 1st April 2024. The landlord's letter dated 15th February 2024 was a reminder of the impending expiry, not a statutory notice of termination under the Act. Since the tenancy was for a definite period and the tenant did not exercise the contractual option to renew by giving the required notice, the tenancy expired by effluxion of time. The statutory notice requirements under Sections 4 and 7 of the Act did not apply to the expiry of a fixed-term lease. Therefore, the landlord's actions were valid, and the tenant's application challenging the notice was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Tenant's reference and application dismissed; tenant to vacate premises by 31st May 2024.

Orders

  • The tenant to vacate from the premises on or before 31st May 2024.
  • The OCS Ongata Rongai to assist in compliance.