[2005] KECA 45 (KLR)

[2005] KECA 45 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, as it was filed about ten days after the previous appeal was struck out. There was no evidence of undue delay or prejudice to the respondent. The respondent did not oppose the application on its merits but only...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KECA 45 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Teresa Moraa Omundi; Applicant: Nyanchoka Omari; Respondent: Stephen Kendu Nyaega
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 216 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file and serve notice and record of appeal out of time. Costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresa Moraa Omundi

Applicant

Nyanchoka Omari

Applicant

Stephen Kendu Nyaega

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file and serve the notice and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether there was undue delay in bringing the application for extension of time.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, as it was filed about ten days after the previous appeal was struck out. There was no evidence of undue delay or prejudice to the respondent. The respondent did not oppose the application on its merits but only sought costs. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application, granting the applicants leave to file and serve the notice of appeal within seven days and the record of appeal within thirty days thereafter. Costs of Kshs. 5,000 were awarded to the respondent, payable within ten days, failing which execution would issue.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file and serve notice and record of appeal out of time. Costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Applicants to file and serve the notice of appeal within seven (7) days from the date hereof.
  • Applicants to lodge the record of appeal within thirty (30) days from the date the notice of appeal is filed.