[2019] KEHC 3043 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents were not the true and actual beneficiaries of the estate of Teresia Akongo Wuoche and Hagnes Owiti Wuoche. The evidence established that the applicants were the biological and step daughters of the deceased and thus entitled to the estate. The respondents failed to prove their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 3043 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Getruda Anyango Ogaga; Applicant: Margaret Obala Osodo; Respondent: George Ochieng Angeng; Respondent: Jenipher Akoth Aolo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2019
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation of grant revoked.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Obtainment of Grant, Concealment of Material Facts, Beneficiary Entitlement, Letters of Administration
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Getruda Anyango Ogaga
Applicant
Margaret Obala Osodo
Applicant
George Ochieng Angeng
Respondent
Jenipher Akoth Aolo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant and certificate of confirmation of grant dated 12th June 2015 were obtained fraudulently by making false statements and/or concealment of material facts.
- 2 Whether the respondents had legal capacity to obtain the grant and be beneficiaries of the estate of Teresia Akongo Wuoche and Hagnes Owiti Wuoche.
- 3 Whether the applicants/objectors are the rightful beneficiaries entitled to the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents were not the true and actual beneficiaries of the estate of Teresia Akongo Wuoche and Hagnes Owiti Wuoche. The evidence established that the applicants were the biological and step daughters of the deceased and thus entitled to the estate. The respondents failed to prove their alleged relationship to the deceased and had no legal capacity to obtain the grant. The process by which the respondents took over the succession cause after the death of Peter Aolo Magolo was irregular, improper, and unlawful, as there was no court-sanctioned substitution or ad litem grant. The information provided to the court by the respondents and their predecessor was false...
Court Disposition
Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation of grant revoked.
Orders
- The impugned grant and certificate of confirmation of grant are revoked forthwith.
- A fresh grant to issue to the two applicants/objectors together with the requisite certificate of confirmation of grant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment