[2017] KEELC 3732 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3732 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence that the parties were served with the notice to show cause before the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant demonstrated that her counsel had made efforts to locate the missing court file and that the delay was not deliberate. In the absence of proper...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3732 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Teresia Aturwa Atonyi; Respondent: Fanuel Mugwang’a Lihanda
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 70 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Application allowed. Order of dismissal set aside. Suit reinstated.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Setting Aside Orders, Service of Notice, Reinstatement of Suit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Setting Aside Orders Service of Notice Reinstatement of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresia Aturwa Atonyi

Applicant

Fanuel Mugwang’a Lihanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the order dismissing the suit for want of prosecution should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the parties were properly served with notice to show cause before dismissal.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in prosecuting the matter was deliberate or excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence that the parties were served with the notice to show cause before the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant demonstrated that her counsel had made efforts to locate the missing court file and that the delay was not deliberate. In the absence of proper service and given the circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the dismissal order and reinstate the suit, holding that the application had merit.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Order of dismissal set aside. Suit reinstated.

Orders

  • The order made on 8th July 2015 dismissing the suit for want of prosecution is set aside.
  • The suit is reinstated for hearing.