[2015] KEHC 358 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondents were collecting rent from properties forming part of the deceased's estate without authority and to the exclusion of other beneficiaries. The court emphasized that such conduct amounts to intermeddling under...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 358 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Teresia Kavili Maingi; Respondent: Mwenzwa Maingi; Respondent: Katavi Maingi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 89 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Intermeddling With Estate, Grant of Letters of Administration, Protection of Estate Assets
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresia Kavili Maingi
Applicant
Mwenzwa Maingi
Respondent
Katavi Maingi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents have unlawfully intermeddled with the estate of the deceased by collecting rent from estate properties without authority.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders restraining the respondents from collecting rent and allowing her to collect and deposit the same in court pending distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondents were collecting rent from properties forming part of the deceased's estate without authority and to the exclusion of other beneficiaries. The court emphasized that such conduct amounts to intermeddling under Section 45 of the Law of Succession Act, which is both prohibited and criminalized. Given the unopposed nature of the application and the evidence presented, the court held that it was necessary to protect the estate by restraining the respondents from further collection of rent and authorizing the applicant to collect and deposit all rent due in court pending further orders or...
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The applicant/petitioner is authorized to collect all rent due, receivable and/or payable from the estate of the deceased.
- All such rent collected shall be deposited in court pending further orders and/or distribution of the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 89 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OFMAINGI MALITI NDUMBA(DECEASED)
TERESIA KAVILI MAINGI...........................................................................PETITIONER/APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. MWENZWA MAINGI
2. KATAVI MAINGI......................................................................................................RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The Petitioner/Applicant approached this court by way of summons pursuant to the provisions of Section 45(1)of the Law of Succession Actand Rules 6(1)and 73of the Probate and Administration Rulesseeking orders that:
The court do issue temporary orders barring Mwenzwa MaingiandKatavi Maingifrom collecting any rent receivable and/or payable by tenants from Plot Nos. 77 Kalundu Market, 4096/R 214 Kaangoand 4096/R 241 (22) Kaagowhich forms part of the intestate Estate of the deceased and/or in any manner interfering or intermeddling with the Estate of the deceased pending hearing of the application interparties.
The court to issue orders allowing the Administratix herein to collect all rent due, receivable and/or payable from the aforesaid plots and deposit the same in court for protection of the liquid part of the intestate Estate of the deceased pending hearing and final distribution of the Estate and/or further orders of the court.
The Applicant swore an affidavit in support of the application where she deposed that the deceased was survived by two (2) wives. He left fully developed plots among other properties from which rent is receivable and payable to tenants being Plot Nos. 77 Kalundu Market, 4096/R 214 Kaangoand 4096/R 241 (22) Kaango.The rent receivable and/or payable from the aforesaid plots by tenants is approximately Kshs. 67,000/=.
That after the demise of the deceased, the Respondents his children colluded and forged a letter dated 1st July, 2015,purportedly written by the firm of Ms. Jacob Mati & Associates Advocates, directing that all tenants in one of the plots 4096/323/A (sic)read plot No. 4096/R 241 (22) Kaangowithin Kitui Municipalityto pay rent only to the said Katavi Maingi.Since then Katavi Maingihas been receiving rent and misappropriating it and thereby intermeddling with the Estate of the deceased an action that is disadvantageous to other beneficiaries.
The Respondents on being served instructed an advocate who sought leave to file a response to the application. Leave was granted as prayed but they failed and/or neglected to file the response within the time given. The application therefore stands unopposed.
The Applicant herein petitioned for letters of administration intestate in respect of the Estate of Maingi Malitiin her capacity as his eldest widow. The deceased was survived by four (4) wives and many children, having been polygamous.
A grant of representation in the matter has not been issued as no notice of grant inviting objections if any has not been published.
The allegation herein is that the Respondents are receiving incoming rent from the Estate of the deceased without any authority.
Section 45of the Law of Successioncriminalizes any act that amounts to intermeddling with the Estate of the deceased. It was the duty of the Applicant herein to demonstrate by way of evidence that such an act is taking place. In the matter of the Estate of Dr. John Muia Kalii (Deceased)where the court found some family members were collecting rent held that since intermeddling is a criminal offence, evidence to support an allegation must be strong.
In the instant matter, it has been demonstrated that the deceased was survived by twenty-seven (27) beneficiaries. Plot No. 4096/R 214located at Kaango Marketis in the name of A. M. Maliti.Payments of rates in respect of the plot is by Maingi Maliti,the deceased.
Annexure “TKM3”is a letter from Jacob Mati & Associates Advocatesreferring to Katavi Maingiof Plot No. 4096/323/A within Kitui Town. Katavi Maingibeing the 2nd Respondent and there being no evidence to disprove the allegation, this calls for issuance of orders to protect the Estate of the deceased.
The first prayer of the application having been spent, I will direct the Applicant/Petitioner to collect all rent due, receivable and/or payable from the Estate of the deceased.
The same shall be deposited in court pending further orders and/or distribution of the Estate. Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 15th day of December, 2015.
L. N. MUTENDE
JUDGE