[2019] KEELC 3482 (KLR)
The court found that the present suit was filed after a final judgment had already been delivered in Thika CMCC No. 336 of 2012 involving the same parties, subject matter, and issues. The doctrine of res judicata, as codified in Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act, precludes the court from entertaining a suit where...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 3482 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Teresia Wanjiru Mbugua; Defendant: Moses Gikonyo Hiram
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Thika
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 47 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Consolidation
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for want of jurisdiction; proceedings declared a nullity
- Judges
- L Ambasi
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, Consolidation of Suits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresia Wanjiru Mbugua
Plaintiff
Moses Gikonyo Hiram
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Consolidation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the present suit is barred by the doctrine of res judicata due to a previous judgment in Thika CMCC No. 336 of 2012.
- 2 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to proceed with the matter given the existence of a prior unchallenged judgment on the same subject matter.
- 3 Whether the consolidation and transfer of the present suit with the lower court case was proper.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the present suit was filed after a final judgment had already been delivered in Thika CMCC No. 336 of 2012 involving the same parties, subject matter, and issues. The doctrine of res judicata, as codified in Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act, precludes the court from entertaining a suit where the issues have already been determined in a previous suit between the same parties. The court emphasized that the only lawful way to challenge the lower court's judgment is through appeal or review, not by instituting a fresh suit. The purported consolidation and transfer of the present suit with the lower court case was deemed unsustainable since the lower court proceedings...
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for want of jurisdiction; proceedings declared a nullity
Orders
- The order of transfer and consolidation of this file with Thika CMCC No. 336/12 given on 15.11.2018 is hereby set aside.
- The two files are hereby separated and the lower court file is to be transmitted back to the CM’s court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT THIKA
ELC CASE NO. 47 OF 2018
(FORMERLY NAIROBI ELC NO. 1385 OF 2013)
TERESIA WANJIRU MBUGUA....................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MOSES GIKONYO HIRAM.......................DEFENDANT
ORDER/RULING
1. As I embarked on the task of writing a judgment in this case, it emerged that a previous suit had been filed in Thika CMCC no. 336 of 2012concerning the same parties the same subject matter and same issues.
2. The only difference is that defendant herein was the plaintiff while plaintiff was the defendant in the lower court case. Judgment in Thika CMCC 336/12 was delivered on 11. 10. 2013. A decree was issued on 16. 12. 2013. Pursuant to that decree, the plaintiff in the lower court case was issued with a title deed on 19. 4.2017.
3. This ELC case was filed on 15. 11. 2013, one month and two days after the delivery of the judgment in the lower court.
4. Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that;
“No court shall proceed with the trial of any suit or proceeding in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit or proceeding between the same parties…..”.
5. The Black’s Law Dictionary 7th edition defines proceedings as “The regular and orderly progression of a law suit including all acts and events between the time of commencement and entry of judgment”.
6. That being the case it was not open for the parties and particularly the plaintiff herein to elect to proceed with the case when the proceedings in the lower court stand as regular and orderly. It is also not open to this court to give a determination of the dispute in the format of a judgment, when there is a judgment of the lower court that has not been challenged.
7. The purported transfer and consolidation of this suit with Thika CMCC no. 336/12 on 15. 11. 2018 through the application filed on 13. 6.2018 is no longer sustainable in view of the fact that the lower court case has been finalized and execution has taken place.
8. In light of the foregoing I find that the proceedings in Thika ELC 47/18 (Formerly ELC No. 1385 of 2013 Nairobi) ought not to have progressed to this stage. Plaintiff ought to have initiated their termination.
9. As long as the judgment in Thika CMCC 336/12 is in force, the only way to challenge the same is through the laid down legal procedures of appeal or review and not to have fresh proceedings in this forum.
10. In the circumstances I find that the proceedings herein are irrelevant a waste of precious judicial time, are of no consequence and are hereby declared a nullity.
11. Final orders are given as follows:
(1) The order of transfer and consolidation of this file with Thika CMCC No. 336/12 given on 15. 11. 2018 is hereby set aside.
(2) The two files are hereby separated and the lower court file is to be transmitted back to the CM’s court.
(3) This suit (Thika ELC 47/2018) is hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction with no orders as to costs.
(4) This order/ruling is to be extracted and to be placed in Thika CMCC 336/12 forthwith.
(5) The ELC file No. 47/18 is marked as closed and is to be taken to the archives.
Dated, signed and delivered at Thika this 2nd May, 2019
MBUGUA LUCY
JUDGE
2/5/2019
In the presence of
J. Kouna holding brief for Onyango for Plaintiff: Present
F.N. Kimani holding brief for Jessee Kariuki for defendant: Present
Plaintiff: Present
Defendant: Absent
M/s Diana Court Assistant.