Wakari v Kague (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 35 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 4041 (KLR) (2 July 2026) (Judgment)

Wakari v Kague (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 35 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 4041 (KLR) (2 July 2026) (Judgment)

The Court held that the Plaintiff proved, on a balance of probabilities, that she had occupied the suit land openly, exclusively and continuously for well over 12 years without interruption, and that the documentary and photographic evidence corroborated her claim. Because the Defendant filed no response and no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 4041 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Teresiah Wachu Wakari; Defendant: Danson Muchoki Kague
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 35 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered for the Plaintiff.
Judges
["JM Kamau"]
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Registration of Title, Originating Summons, Substituted Service, Costs
Source Language
en
Land Law Property Law Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Registration of Title Originating Summons Substituted Service Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresiah Wachu Wakari

Plaintiff

Danson Muchoki Kague

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff had acquired title to the suit land by adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff was entitled to an order directing transfer and registration of the land in her name.
  3. 3 Whether costs should follow the event.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Plaintiff proved, on a balance of probabilities, that she had occupied the suit land openly, exclusively and continuously for well over 12 years without interruption, and that the documentary and photographic evidence corroborated her claim. Because the Defendant filed no response and no evidence contradicted the claim, the Court entered judgment for the Plaintiff and granted registration by adverse possession.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • A declaration issued that the Plaintiff is entitled to be registered as proprietor of Title No. Nyandarua/Ol-Joro-Orok Salient/1740 measuring 2.0 hectares by virtue of adverse possession.
  • The Deputy Registrar of the Court authorized to execute all necessary documents to vest ownership of Title No. Nyandarua/Ol-Joro-Orok Salient/1740 in the Plaintiff.