[2024] KEHC 2159 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 2159 (KLR)

The court found that the certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 90,879 had not been set aside or altered and was therefore final as to the amount due. There was no dispute as to the retainer or the amount taxed, and the respondent had not opposed the application. The applicant was entitled to judgment for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 2159 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Kinyanjui Theuri & Kariuki Njuguna t/a Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates; Respondent: Meshack Obonyo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 224 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
PN Gichohi
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kinyanjui Theuri & Kariuki Njuguna t/a Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates

Applicant

Meshack Obonyo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum is payable and from what date.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent has disputed the retainer or the amount taxed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 90,879 had not been set aside or altered and was therefore final as to the amount due. There was no dispute as to the retainer or the amount taxed, and the respondent had not opposed the application. The applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed sum. However, the court held that interest at 14% per annum could only accrue from thirty days after service of the bill of costs dated 01/11/2021, not from 2013 as sought by the applicant, since the bill had not been presented for taxation until 2021. The court therefore entered judgment for the applicant for Kshs. 90,879 with interest at 14% per annum from thirty days after...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 90,879 together with interest at 14% per annum calculable after thirty days from the date the bill of costs dated 01/11/2021 was served until payment in full.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.