https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2707

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2707

The applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate substantial loss or effectively rebut the respondent’s specific evidence that she had vacated the property and that the premises were under a tenancy arrangement; the threshold for stay and injunction was therefore not met.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 2707 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Mary Wairimu Theuri; Respondent: Ann Wanjiku Theuri
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E034 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Injunction Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Judges
["LN Mbugua"]
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution Pending Appeal, Injunction Pending Appeal, Substantial Loss, Appellate Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Environment and Land Law Appellate Procedure Stay of Execution Pending Appeal Injunction Pending Appeal Substantial Loss Appellate Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wairimu Theuri

Applicant/appellant

Ann Wanjiku Theuri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Injunction Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant met the threshold for stay of execution pending appeal
  2. 2 Whether injunctive relief was justified pending appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate substantial loss or effectively rebut the respondent’s specific evidence that she had vacated the property and that the premises were under a tenancy arrangement; the threshold for stay and injunction was therefore not met.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated 13.10.2025 is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.