[2000] KECA 369 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 369 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, as there was no undue delay between the striking out of the previous appeal and the filing of the present motion, especially considering the intervening Christmas vacation. The court held that the mistakes...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 369 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Thika Municipal Council; Applicant: Joseph Muthuku Kamweru; Respondent: Jane Nyambura
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 2 of ??
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Procedural Default
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Procedural Default

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thika Municipal Council

Applicant

Joseph Muthuku Kamweru

Applicant

Jane Nyambura

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether previous mistakes by counsel should bar the applicants from obtaining the extension sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, as there was no undue delay between the striking out of the previous appeal and the filing of the present motion, especially considering the intervening Christmas vacation. The court held that the mistakes previously made by the applicants' counsel had already been sufficiently punished by the striking out of the earlier appeal and should not be used again to deny the applicants the extension sought. The respondent did not oppose the application, further supporting the grant of the orders. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to allow the extension of time for filing the notice...

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Applicants must file their notices of appeal within seven days of the date hereof.
  • Applicants must file their record of appeal within fourteen days from the date the notices of appeal are lodged.