[2008] KEHC 1469 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established a clear and incontrovertible case for the grant of a mandatory injunction. The plaintiff demonstrated that he had the legal authority to bring the suit as the holder of letters of administration ad litem, and that the suit properties were registered in his deceased...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 1469 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Thom Samuel Maroro; Defendant: Isaac Magangi Omwoyo; Defendant: Joseph Oenga Omwoyo; Defendant: Evans Nyasini Omwoyo; Defendant: Sabina Osebe Omwoyo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 31 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application for mandatory injunction granted.
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Injunction, Intermeddling With Estate, Land Trespass, Letters of Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thom Samuel Maroro
Plaintiff
Isaac Magangi Omwoyo
Defendant
Joseph Oenga Omwoyo
Defendant
Evans Nyasini Omwoyo
Defendant
Sabina Osebe Omwoyo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Mandatory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a mandatory injunction compelling the defendants to vacate the suit properties pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the defendants' actions constitute unlawful intermeddling with the estate of a deceased person.
- 3 Whether the defendants' occupation of the suit properties is justified in law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established a clear and incontrovertible case for the grant of a mandatory injunction. The plaintiff demonstrated that he had the legal authority to bring the suit as the holder of letters of administration ad litem, and that the suit properties were registered in his deceased father's name. The defendants, having failed to respond or justify their actions, were deemed to have unlawfully invaded the suit properties and intermeddled with the estate. The court held that the defendants' actions were calculated to defeat ongoing judicial review proceedings and that, in the absence of any explanation or legal justification, a mandatory injunction was...
Court Disposition
Application for mandatory injunction granted.
Orders
- A mandatory injunction is issued compelling the defendants, their agents and/or servants to vacate parcels of land known as MAJOGE/BOOCHI 2342 and MAJOGE/BOOCH/2343 pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- The defendants shall bear the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
48 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
Civil Case 31 of 2008
THOM SAMUEL MARORO ……………..………….…. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
1. ISAAC MAGANGI OMWOYO )
2. JOSEPH OENGA OMWOYO )
3. EVANS NYASINI OMWOYO ) …..…..……..…. DEFENDANTS
4. SABINA OSEBE OMWOYO )
RULING
The plaintiff filed an application dated 14th May, 2008. He prayed for a mandatory order of injunction to compel the defendants, their agents and/or servants to vacate parcels of land known as MAJOGE/BOOCHI 2342 and MAJOGE/BOOCH/2343, hereinafter referred to as “the suit properties”pending hearing and determination of this suit.
The application was supported by an affidavit sworn by the plaintiff. The application was made on the following grounds:
(a) The suit properties are registered in the name
of the plaintiff’s deceased father, SAMSON MARORO
OCHANDA, and the plaintiff has been granted letters
of Administration Ad Litem to enable him to
institute this suit.
(b) The defendants had unlawfully invaded the suit properties and put up temporary structures thereon and were threatening to harm the plaintiff for resisting their invasion of the suit properties.
(c) That the defendants had their own parcels of land at Mosora in Bassi constituency and had no reason
for trespassing on the suit properties.
(d) That the defendants were intermeddling with the
estate of a deceased person, the plaintiff’s father
having been in occupation of the suit properties
for over 50 years.
(e) The defendants had filed a claim over the said
parcels of land at Ogembo Land Disputes Tribunal
but the plaintiff filed judicial review proceedings
arguing that the said Tribunal had no jurisdiction
to handle the claim. When the defendants were
served with the judicial review application they
decided to move into the suit properties forcefully
and destroyed crops that were growing thereon.
The defendants filed neither a replying affidavit nor grounds of opposition. The plaintiff’s application seeks a mandatory injunction to compel the defendants to move out of the suit properties and remove their structures thereon.
It is true that the plaintiff herein has commenced judicial review proceedings against the Chairman, Gucha Land Disputes Tribunal as well as the defendants herein; the same is Misc. Civil Application No.25 of 2008. The defendants’ action of invading the suit land is clearly calculated to defeat or frustrate those proceedings. The defendants have not advanced any reason to justify their actions. In the absence of any explanation, I take it that their actions amount to outright intermeddling with an estate of a deceased person.
In MALIDI AIR SERVICES & ANOTHER VS HALIMA ABDINOOR HASSAN, Civil Application No.202 of 1998, the Court of Appeal stated that:
“A mandatory injunction at an interlocutory stage
is rarely granted; only when the plaintiff’s case is
clear and incontrovertible.”
I believe the above may be said of the plaintiff’s case. The mandatory injunction order sought by the plaintiff is justified and I grant the same. The defendants shall bear the costs of this application.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVEREDat KISII this 29th day of September, 2008.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.
Delivered in the open court in the presence of:
Mr. Momanyi for the Plaintiff.
N/A for the defendants.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE.