[2019] KEELC 4371 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4371 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities. The property in question, Kakamega/Viyalo/1, had ceased to exist and was subdivided into new parcels, as established in a previous suit (PALASINA SIBIRO LUBEKA VS THOMAS ANZEZE ELC Case No 8 of 2015). The plaintiff did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4371 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Thomas Anzeze Musira; Defendant: Samson Jarena
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 27 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
plaintiff's suit dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Eviction, Ownership Dispute, Title Verification
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Ownership Dispute Title Verification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Anzeze Musira

Plaintiff

Samson Jarena

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an eviction order against the defendant from property known as Kakamega/Viyalo/1.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has proved ownership and entitlement to the suit property on a balance of probabilities.
  3. 3 Whether the suit is frivolous or an abuse of court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities. The property in question, Kakamega/Viyalo/1, had ceased to exist and was subdivided into new parcels, as established in a previous suit (PALASINA SIBIRO LUBEKA VS THOMAS ANZEZE ELC Case No 8 of 2015). The plaintiff did not provide a current search certificate, and the title produced was outdated (from 1998). The court held that the suit was frivolous and an abuse of the court process, as it was based on non-existent property and lacked current evidence of ownership. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim for eviction was dismissed.

Court Disposition

plaintiff's suit dismissed

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.