[2017] KEHC 2742 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2742 (KLR)

The court held that Manyani Maximum G K Prison would comply with Article 35(1)(b) of the Constitution by making copies of the relevant statutes available in the prison library for the applicants' perusal, given the financial and administrative constraints. The court declined to interfere with the administrative...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2742 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Morara Nyabenga; Applicant: Charles Okello Olala; Applicant: Dennis Mateyo Omaiyo; Respondent: The PS Interior Ministry; Respondent: The Commissioner General of Prisons; Respondent: The P.P.C. Coast Region; Respondent: The Officer in Charge Manyani Prison; Respondent: The Attorney General of Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 4 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Misc Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications and Directions
Outcome
Interlocutory orders granted; directions issued for further hearing.
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Right of Access to Information, Prisoners Rights, Administrative Discretion, Transfer of Prisoners
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Right of Access to Information Prisoners Rights Administrative Discretion Transfer of Prisoners

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Morara Nyabenga

Applicant

Charles Okello Olala

Applicant

Dennis Mateyo Omaiyo

Applicant

The PS Interior Ministry

Respondent

The Commissioner General of Prisons

Respondent

The P.P.C. Coast Region

Respondent

The Officer in Charge Manyani Prison

Respondent

The Attorney General of Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Misc Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the applicants, as inmates, are entitled to access copies of statutes under Article 35(1)(b) of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order the transfer of the applicants to different prisons or leave such decisions to prison administration.
  3. 3 Whether the Officer-in-Charge of Manyani Prison should be compelled to appear personally during the hearing of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Manyani Maximum G K Prison would comply with Article 35(1)(b) of the Constitution by making copies of the relevant statutes available in the prison library for the applicants' perusal, given the financial and administrative constraints. The court declined to interfere with the administrative discretion regarding the transfer of inmates, leaving such decisions to the Officer-in-Charge unless a formal application is made. The court also directed the Deputy Registrar to facilitate service of the petition and orders on relevant statutory bodies and emphasized the need to respect the applicants' rights under Article 28 during incarceration. The Attorney General was directed...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders granted; directions issued for further hearing.

Orders

  • Manyani Maximum G K Prison to avail copies of Cap 90, The Prisoners Transfer Act, 2015, Persons Deprived of Liberty Act 2015, and the Torture Act 2017 in its library for applicants' perusal.
  • Transfer of applicants left to the discretion of the Officer-in-Charge, with no court interference unless formally applied for.