[2018] KEELRC 278 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 278 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant failed to produce any documentary evidence or call witnesses to prove that he was employed by the respondent. As a result, the evidence fell below the required standard to establish the existence of an employment relationship or to support the claims of unfair termination and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 278 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Thomas Mwanyumba Mwabara; Respondent: Sun Cross Cafe
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 314 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Redundancy, Termination Dues, House Allowance, Service Pay, Certificate of Service
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Redundancy Termination Dues House Allowance Service Pay Certificate of Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Mwanyumba Mwabara

Claimant

Sun Cross Cafe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was an employee of the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal dues including house allowance, salary in lieu of notice, service pay, and certificate of service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant failed to produce any documentary evidence or call witnesses to prove that he was employed by the respondent. As a result, the evidence fell below the required standard to establish the existence of an employment relationship or to support the claims of unfair termination and entitlement to terminal dues. The absence of a response from the respondent did not relieve the claimant of his burden of proof. Consequently, the claim was dismissed for lack of evidence.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed with no order as to costs.