[2019] KEELRC 2378 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2378 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements for redundancy under Section 40(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The redundancy notice was backdated, and there was no evidence of notification to the labour officer or personal written notice to the Claimant. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2378 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Thomas Otieno Onyango; Respondent: T.S.S Transporters Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 272 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Redundancy Procedure, Statutory Compliance, Compensation for Unfair Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Redundancy Procedure Statutory Compliance Compensation for Unfair Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Otieno Onyango

Claimant

T.S.S Transporters Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant’s employment was lawful and fair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements for redundancy under Section 40(1) of the Employment Act, 2007. The redundancy notice was backdated, and there was no evidence of notification to the labour officer or personal written notice to the Claimant. The Respondent also failed to demonstrate compliance with other statutory requirements such as payment of severance and proper selection criteria. As a result, the termination was deemed unfair within the meaning of Section 45 of the Act. The Claimant was therefore entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, gratuity, leave pay, salary arrears, and costs. Claims for...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 377,042 as compensation and terminal dues.
  • The amount shall attract interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.