[2017] KEHC 3629 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3629 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had been convicted and sentenced in two separate criminal cases for similar offences of burglary and stealing, but the sentencing courts were unaware of the other conviction due to the matters being heard by different magistrates. The applicant's request for the sentences to run...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3629 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Thomas Otieno Otieno alias Ogoga; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 12 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Concurrent Sentencing
Outcome
Application allowed. Sentences in Homa Bay CM Criminal Case No 84 of 2015 and No 85 of 2015 to run concurrently.
Judges
DO Ohungo
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Concurrent Sentences, Burglary, Stealing, Previous Convictions
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Concurrent Sentences Burglary Stealing Previous Convictions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Otieno Otieno alias Ogoga

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Concurrent Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the sentences in Homa Bay CM Criminal Case No 84 of 2015 and No 85 of 2015 should run concurrently.
  2. 2 Whether the court was aware of the applicant's previous conviction at the time of sentencing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had been convicted and sentenced in two separate criminal cases for similar offences of burglary and stealing, but the sentencing courts were unaware of the other conviction due to the matters being heard by different magistrates. The applicant's request for the sentences to run concurrently was not opposed by the prosecution. The court held that it was reasonable and just to allow the sentences in Homa Bay CM Criminal Case No 84 of 2015 and No 85 of 2015 to run concurrently, thereby granting the applicant's prayer.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Sentences in Homa Bay CM Criminal Case No 84 of 2015 and No 85 of 2015 to run concurrently.

Orders

  • The sentences in Homa Bay CM Criminal Case No 84 of 2015 and No 85 of 2015 shall run concurrently.