[2024] KEHC 15057 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15057 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to amend the Memorandum of Appeal was unopposed, as the respondents neither attended the hearing nor filed any response. There was no evidence of prejudice or injustice that would result from granting the application. The court, therefore, exercised its discretion to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15057 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Salome Wanjiru Thuo; Appellant: Gladys Mumbi Ndua; Respondent: Nelson Githinji Ndua; Respondent: Virginia Wanini
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Family Appeal E005 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed as unopposed; leave to amend Memorandum of Appeal granted.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Leave to Amend Pleadings, Memorandum of Appeal, Unopposed Application
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Leave to Amend Pleadings Memorandum of Appeal Unopposed Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salome Wanjiru Thuo

Appellant

Gladys Mumbi Ndua

Appellant

Nelson Githinji Ndua

Respondent

Virginia Wanini

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants should be granted leave to amend their Memorandum of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed amended Memorandum of Appeal should be deemed properly filed upon payment of requisite court fees.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be determined at this stage or abide the outcome of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to amend the Memorandum of Appeal was unopposed, as the respondents neither attended the hearing nor filed any response. There was no evidence of prejudice or injustice that would result from granting the application. The court, therefore, exercised its discretion to allow the appellants to amend their Memorandum of Appeal, deeming the proposed amended Memorandum as properly filed and served upon payment of requisite court fees. The issue of costs was deferred to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as unopposed; leave to amend Memorandum of Appeal granted.

Orders

  • The appellants are granted leave to amend their Memorandum of Appeal.
  • The proposed amended Memorandum of Appeal is deemed properly filed and served upon payment of requisite court fees.