[2018] KEELRC 1699 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent and was terminated without notice or a valid reason, contrary to the requirements of the Employment Act. The claimant was not paid for 13 days worked in December 2014 and was not given annual leave for two years. The court held that the claimant was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1699 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Timothy K. Odindo; Respondent: Bakers Delight Holding Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1546 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement, House Allowance Claims, Overtime Disputes, Compensation for Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy K. Odindo
Claimant
Bakers Delight Holding Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for 13 days worked in December 2014.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to one month pay in lieu of notice.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to service pay despite NSSF membership.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent and was terminated without notice or a valid reason, contrary to the requirements of the Employment Act. The claimant was not paid for 13 days worked in December 2014 and was not given annual leave for two years. The court held that the claimant was entitled to payment for days worked, pay in lieu of notice, and compensation for unfair termination. Claims for service pay, house allowance, overtime, and leave travelling allowance were dismissed as the claimant was a member of NSSF, had agreed to a consolidated salary, and had not raised grievances regarding those claims during employment. The court awarded the claimant Kshs....
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs. 216,071.00 by 01.08.2018, failing which interest to run at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment.
- The respondent to pay the claimant’s costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1546 OF 2015
TIMOTHY K. ODINDO.............................................CLAIMANT
- VERSUS -
BAKERS DELIGHT HOLDING LIMITED.....RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 22nd June, 2018)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the memorandum of claim on 02. 09. 2015 through Wilfred K. Babu & Company Advocates. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for:
a. 13 days salary for December 2014 Kshs. 6, 071. 00.
b. One month pay in lieu of notice Kshs.14, 000. 00.
c. Unpaid service for 2 years at 15 days per year Kshs.14, 000. 00.
d. Two years’ leave Kshs.28, 000. 00.
e. Unpaid house allowance for 2 years at 15% basic pay Kshs. 50, 400. 00.
f. Unpaid overtime 1. 5 per hours for 1318 hours by Kshs.58 per hour Kshs. 114, 666. 00.
g. Unpaid leave travelling allowance for 2 years at Kshs.3, 000. 00 per year making Kshs.6, 000. 00.
h. 12 months’ salaries for damages for unfair termination Kshs. 168, 000. 00.
i. Costs and interest.
Despite service the respondent did not enter appearance and did not attend at the hearing of the suit. The claimant testified to support his claims.
The Court has considered the evidence, the pleadings, and the submissions on record. The respondent employed the claimant as a chef from 01. 11. 2012 to December 2012. The claimant was terminated on 13. 12. 2014 without a notice and without a reason being assigned. The Court has considered the matter in dispute and finds that the only issue for determination is whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies as prayed for. The Court makes findings as follows:
a. The claimant worked for 13 days in December 2014 and was not paid and is awarded Kshs. 6, 071. 00 as prayed for.
b. The termination was without a notice as per section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007 and the claimant is awarded one month pay in lieu of notice Kshs.14, 000. 00.
c. The claimant was a member of the NSSF and is not entitled to unpaid service for 2 years at 15 days per year Kshs.14, 000. 00. Section 35(6) of the Act applies and the prayer will fail.
d. The claimant was not given annual leave for the two years of service and in lieu of annual leave he is awarded Kshs.28, 000. 00 as prayed for.
e. The claimant testified that they agreed upon a consolidated pay and there being no justification, the prayer for unpaid house allowance for 2 years at 15% basic pay making Kshs. 50, 400. 00 will fail – the claimant’s evidence being that parties never agreed on payment of house allowance and that there was no grievance in that regard because he never demanded payment of house allowance throughout the service.
f. The claimant testified that the agreed salary covered all the hours worked and there was no agreement on overtime. The Court returns that the parties are bound by the agreement on the monthly pay of Kshs.14, 000. 00 for all the work done. The prayer for unpaid overtime 1. 5 per hours for 1318 hours by Kshs.58 per hour Kshs. 114, 666. 00 will therefore fail as unjustified - the claimant confirmed that there had been no grievance about overtime and he never demanded the same throughout the service and that he knew, and the agreement was, that he works from 6. 00am to 6. 00pm.
g. The claimant did not justify unpaid leave travelling allowance for 2 years at Kshs.3, 000. 00 per year making Kshs.6, 000. 00. The prayer will therefore fail.
h. The termination was without notice and a hearing as per section 41 of the Act. There was no valid reason as envisaged in section 43 of the Act. The termination was therefore unfair. The Court has considered the claimant’s clean record of service, he did not contribute to the termination, the termination was abrupt and that he desired to continue in employment. Under section 49 of the Act, the claimant is awarded the 12 months’ salaries in compensation for unfair termination Kshs. 168, 000. 00 as prayed for.
In conclusion judgment is hereby entered for the claimant against the respondent for:
a. Payment of Kshs.216, 071. 00 by 01. 08. 2018 failing interest to run thereon at Court rates from the date of this judgment till full payment.
b. The respondent to pay claimant’s costs of the suit.
Signed, datedanddeliveredin court atNairobithisFriday 22nd June, 2018.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE