[2019] KEHC 7902 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that he was lawfully operating a betting and gaming business, as he did not produce any license or permit authorizing such operations. The Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act criminalizes the use of unauthorized gaming machines, and the applicant bore the burden...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7902 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Timothy Maunda Mbiti; Respondent: Winston Kiambi Murungi, The Deputy County Commissioner, Butula Sub-County; Respondent: Paul Rop, The Deputy County Commissioner, Samia/Funyula Sub-County; Respondent: James Kareri Thuo, The Assistant County Commissioner, Funyula Division; Respondent: The DCIO Butula Police Division; Respondent: The OCS Bumala Police Station; Respondent: The OCS Funyula Police Station; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The Director Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 20 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Seizure of Property, Betting and Gaming Regulation, Police Powers, Licensing Requirements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Maunda Mbiti
Applicant
Winston Kiambi Murungi, The Deputy County Commissioner, Butula Sub-County
Respondent
Paul Rop, The Deputy County Commissioner, Samia/Funyula Sub-County
Respondent
James Kareri Thuo, The Assistant County Commissioner, Funyula Division
Respondent
The DCIO Butula Police Division
Respondent
The OCS Bumala Police Station
Respondent
The OCS Funyula Police Station
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
The Director Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to the return of confiscated betting and gaming machines.
- 2 Whether the applicant established a prima facie case for the grant of the orders sought.
- 3 Whether the police acted within their statutory mandate in seizing the machines.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that he was lawfully operating a betting and gaming business, as he did not produce any license or permit authorizing such operations. The Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act criminalizes the use of unauthorized gaming machines, and the applicant bore the burden of proving the legitimacy of his business. The police, acting under their statutory mandate, were justified in seizing the machines as part of their duty to prevent and investigate crime. Granting the orders sought would undermine the police's ability to enforce the law. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
MISCALLENEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2018
TIMOTHY MAUNDA MBITI……….…...……………………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
WINSTON KIAMBI MURUNGI
THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER
BUTULA SUB-COUNTY…….…………………………………………1ST RESPONDENT
PAUL ROP
THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER
SAMIA/FUNYULA SUB-COUNTY ………….……………………….2ND RESPONDENT
JAMES KARERI THUO
THE ASSISTANT COUNTY COMMISSIONER
FUNYULA DIVISION ………………………………………………...3RD RESPONDENT
THE DCIO BUTULA POLICE DIVISION …….…………………….4TH RESPONDENT
THE OCS BUMALA POLICE STATION……..……………………. 5TH RESPONDENT
THE OCS FUNYULA POLICE STATION ……….………………… 6TH RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………….…..………………. 7TH RESPONDENT
THE DIRECTOR PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS …..….…………….. 8TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Timothy Maunda Mbiti,the applicant herein, has moved the court by way of Chamber Summons dated 23rd August, 2018 under Articles 165(3) 2, 10, 19, 20 (1), (2), (3), 21, 22 and various other Articles of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. He is seeking orders as follows:
a) That this court do issue summons to the 1st to 4th respondents requiring them to render a proper inventory of the confiscated Betting and Gaming Machines belonging to the applicant.
b) That this court do issue an order to the 5th and 6th respondents to take charge collect/or gather the machines from the 1st and the 2nd respondents and record them in the occurrence Books at Bumala and Funyula police stations pending the hearing and determination of this application.
c) That this court do issue an order to the 1st and 2nd respondents or their subordinate officers and any other person acting under or through them to immediately and forthwith release the Betting and Gaming machines to the applicant pending the hearing and determination of this application.
d) That the cost of this application be borne by the respondents.
2. The application was supported by a sworn affidavit of the applicant and was premised on the following grounds:
a) That the applicant herein is a businessman involved in operation of gaming machines within Busia County and other counties within the Republic of Kenya.
b) That on 3rd august 2018, Criminal Investigation Officers raided his business premises at Bumala and confiscated his six Betting and Gaming Machines.
c) That on 9th august 2018, a group of Administration Police officers raided his business premises and seized his three Slot Machines.
d) That there were no charges preferred against him.
3. The applicant though he described himself as a businessman, did not exhibit any license allowing him to conduct the betting and gaming business in Busia County. The applicant had the onus of establishing before the court that he was running a bona fide business. Section 53 of the Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act provides:
(1) A person who—
(a) uses or permits the use of an unauthorized gaming machine; or
(b) knowingly allows premises to be used for the purpose of gaming by
means of an unauthorized gaming machine; or
(c) knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that premises would be used for gaming by means of an unauthorized gaming machine—
(i) caused or allowed the machine to be placed on the premises; or
(ii) let the premises, or otherwise made the premises available, to a person by whom an offence in connection with the machine was committed,
shall be guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not exceeding five thousand shillings or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both.
(2) In this section, “unauthorized gaming machine” means a gaming machine in respect of which a permit has not been issued under section 54.
4. Part VII of The National Police Service Act lays down the duties of the police to include investigations, prevention and detection of crime. The applicant has not established a prima facie case to warrant the issuance of the orders sought. To do so, would be tantamount to curtailing the operations of the police to maintain law and order.
5. The application is in want of merits and is accordingly dismissed.
DELIVERED and SIGNED at BUSIA this 29th day of April, 2019
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE.